International Consensus Classification Research Articles

CEBPA mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: implications in risk stratification and treatment.

Mutations in CCAAT enhancer binding protein α (CEBPA) occur in approximately 10% of patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Emerging evidence supports that in-frame mutations in the basic leucine zipper domain of CEBPA (CEBPAbZIP-inf) confer a survival benefit, and CEBPAbZIP-inf replaced CEBPA double mutations (CEBPAdm) as a unique entity in the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO-2022) classification and International Consensus Classification (ICC). However, challenges remain in daily clinical practice since more than 30% patients with CEBPAbZIP-inf die of AML despite intensive treatment. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the heterogeneities observed in AML with CEBPAdm and CEBPAbZIP-inf, and will discuss the prognostic implications of concurrent mutations and novel mechanistic targets that may inform future drug development. The ultimate goal is to optimize clinical management and to provide precision medicine for this category of patients.

Artificial intelligence and classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms.

Hematologists, geneticists, and clinicians came to a multidisciplinary agreement on the classification of lymphoid neoplasms that combines clinical features, histological characteristics, immunophenotype, and molecular pathology analyses. The current classification includes the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues revised 4th edition, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of mature lymphoid neoplasms (report from the Clinical Advisory Committee 2022), and the 5th edition of the proposed WHO Classification of haematolymphoid tumours (lymphoid neoplasms, WHO-HAEM5). This article revises the recent advances in the classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms. Artificial intelligence (AI) has advanced rapidly recently, and its role in medicine is becoming more important as AI integrates computer science and datasets to make predictions or classifications based on complex input data. Summarizing previous research, it is described how several machine learning and neural networks can predict the prognosis of the patients, and classified mature B-cell neoplasms. In addition, new analysis predicted lymphoma subtypes using cell-of-origin markers that hematopathologists use in the clinical routine, including CD3, CD5, CD19, CD79A, MS4A1 (CD20), MME (CD10), BCL6, IRF4 (MUM-1), BCL2, SOX11, MNDA, and FCRL4 (IRTA1). In conclusion, although most categories are similar in both classifications, there are also conceptual differences and differences in the diagnostic criteria for some diseases. It is expected that AI will be incorporated into the lymphoma classification as another bioinformatics tool.

Validation and comparison of 5th edition World Health Organization classification (WHO 2022) and International Consensus Classification proposals for MDS-SFB31.

The criteria of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with mutated SFB31 (MDS-SFB31) proposed by the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO 2022) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) need validation. We analysed 125 consecutive MDS cases with SFB31 mutation or ring sideroblasts (RS) ≥15% without excess blasts. We found that SFB31-negative MDS with RS had significantly different clinical features and worse prognosis. According to WHO 2022, the detection of ≥15% RS may substitute for SF3B1 mutation and our analyses support this proposal for similar prognosis of two groups after excluding high-risk genetic features referred by WHO 2022. Patients with variant allele frequency (VAF) <10% SFB31 tend to have briefer survival, supporting the VAF 10% threshold of ICC. Patients with multilineage dysplasia (MLD) had significantly shorter OS than those with single lineage dysplasia. MLD is still a powerful morphological marker of worse outcome in WHO 2022 and ICC-defined MDS-SF3B1.

A Brief Overview of the Molecular Landscape of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

Myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of clonal hematological disorders that originate from the hematopoietic and progenitor cells and present with cytopenias and morphologic dysplasia with a propensity to progress to bone marrow failure or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Genetic evolution plays a critical role in the pathogenesis, progression, and clinical outcomes of MDS. This process involves the acquisition of genetic mutations in stem cells that confer a selective growth advantage, leading to clonal expansion and the eventual development of MDS. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays, an increasing number of molecular aberrations have been discovered in recent years. The knowledge of molecular events in MDS has led to an improved understanding of the disease process, including the evolution of the disease and prognosis, and has paved the way for targeted therapy. The 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) have incorporated the molecular signature into the classification system for MDS. In addition, specific germline mutations are associated with MDS development, especially in pediatrics and young adults. This article reviews the genetic abnormalities of MDS in adults with a brief review of germline predisposition syndromes.

B- and T-/NK-Cell Lymphomas in the 2022 International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms and Comparison with the WHO Fifth Edition

B- and T-/NK-Cell Lymphomas in the 2022 International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms and Comparison with the WHO Fifth Edition

What is new in acute myeloid leukemia classification?

Recently, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification (WHO2022) introduced diagnostically similar yet distinct approaches, which has resulted in practical confusion. This review compares these classification systems for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), building up on the revised 4th edition of WHO (WHO2016). Both classifications retain recurrent genetic abnormalities as a primary consideration. However, they differ in terms of blast threshold. The ICC mandates a minimum of 10% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood, whereas the WHO2022 does not specify a blast cut-off. AML with BCR::ABL1 requires > 20% blast count in both classifications. In WHO2022, AML with CEBPA mutation requires > 20% blasts. TP53 mutation, a new entity is exclusive to ICC, diagnosed with > 20% blasts and variant allele frequency > 10%. AML with myelodysplasia-related changes is defined by cytogenetic or gene mutation-based criteria, not morphological dysplasia. Eight genes were common to both groups: ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2. An additional gene, RUNX1, was included in the ICC classification. AML cases defined by differentiation (WHO2022) and AML not otherwise specified (ICC) are categorized as lacking specific defining genetic abnormalities, WHO2022 labels this as a myeloid neoplasm post cytotoxic therapy (MN-pCT), described as an appendix after specific diagnosis. Similarly, in ICC, it can be described as "therapy-related", without a separate AML category.

[Rare differential diagnosis of an osteolytic lesion of the mandible in a young adult].

We report ararely occurring hematologic neoplasm in ayoung adult. Hematologic neoplasms were first described in 2008 and are now included in both accepted tumor classification systems, i.e., International Consensus Classification and World Health Organization. This hematologic neoplasm shows acharacteristic ALK positivity in immunohistochemical examination and correspondingly, ALK fusion genes in the molecular analysis. Pathologists should be aware of this entity, particularly as it is challenging to differentiate from other more frequent neoplasms of the same disease group or mesenchymal neoplasm with ALK aberration.

Investigates the genetic types of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in full remission Indonesian patients: a cross-sectional analysis

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is most common in children, especially those aged 1–4 years old, and the second most common acute leukemia in adults. The updated International Consensus Classification (ICC) of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) includes recent clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular data. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on 200 bone marrow specimens using TruSeq library preparation and HiSeq 2000/2500 or NovaSeq 6000 sequencers (Illumina). The purpose of this study was to define the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities of ALL patients in adults and children in Indonesian patients after full remission for international collaboration has improved and advanced the diagnosis and treatment of ALL in Indonesia. Our resulting data showed that the most common structural abnormality was t(9;22) in 15% of the patients. The frequency of genetic abnormalities was 69 % and 60% for numerical and/or structural in the B-ALL and T-ALL patients, respectively. The adults had a higher incidence of t(9;22) and a lower incidence of hyperdiploid than children. In conclusion: The results of this study molecular subtypes differ strikingly in their responses to treatment that needs more assessment.

Comparison of the 2022 world health organization classification and international consensus classification in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms

In 2022, two novel classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have been proposed: the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO-2022) classification. These two contemporary systems exhibit numerous shared features but also diverge significantly in terminology and the definition of new entities. Thus, we retrospectively validated the ICC and WHO-2022 classification and found that both systems promoted efficient segregation of this heterogeneous disease. After examining the distinction between the two systems, we showed that a peripheral blood blast percentage ≥ 5% indicates adverse survival. Identifying MDS/acute myeloid leukemia with MDS-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities helps differentiate survival outcomes. In MDS, not otherwise specified patients, those diagnosed with hypoplastic MDS and single lineage dysplasia displayed a trend of superior survival compared to other low-risk MDS patients. Furthermore, the impact of bone marrow fibrosis on survival was less pronounced within the ICC framework. Allogeneic transplantation appears to improve outcomes for patients diagnosed with MDS with excess blasts in the ICC. Therefore, we proposed an integrated system that may lead to the accurate diagnosis and advancement of future research for MDS. Prospective studies are warranted to validate this refined classification.

Classifications of cutaneous lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders: An update from the EORTC cutaneous lymphoma histopathology group.

The classification of primary cutaneous lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) is continuously evolving by integrating novel clinical, pathological and molecular data. Recently two new classifications for haematological malignancies including entities of cutaneous lymphomas were proposed: the 5th edition of the WHO classification of haematolymphoid tumours and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of mature lymphoid neoplasms. This article provides an overview of the changes introduced in these two classifications compared to the previous WHO classification. The main changes shared by both classifications include the downgrading of CD8+ acral T-cell lymphoma to CD8+ acral T-cell LPD, and the recognition of entities that were previously categorized as provisional and have now been designated as definite types including primary cutaneous small or medium CD4+ T-cell LPD, primary cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma, primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma, Epstein-Barr virus-positive mucocutaneous ulcer. Both classifications consider primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell clonal neoplasm as an indolent disease but use a different terminology: primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (WHO) and primary cutaneous marginal zone LPD (ICC). The 5th WHO classification further introduces and provides essential and desirable diagnostic criteria for each disease type and includes chapters on reactive B- or T-cell rich lymphoid proliferations formerly referred as cutaneous pseudolymphomas, as well as histiocyte and CD8 T-cell rich LPD in patients with inborn error of immunity. As already emphasized in previous lymphoma classifications, the importance of integrating clinical, histological, phenotypic and molecular features remains the crucial conceptual base for defining cutaneous (and extracutaneous) lymphomas.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape.

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More recently, prognostication and treatment have been determined by cytogenetic and molecular data. Specific genetic abnormalities, such as deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)), TP53 inactivation and SF3B1 mutation, are increasingly associated with disease phenotype and outcome, as reflected in the recently updated fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification 2022 (ICC 2022) classification systems. Treatment of lower-risk MDS is primarily symptom directed to ameliorate cytopenias. Higher-risk disease warrants disease-directed therapy at diagnosis; however, the only possible cure is an allogenic bone marrow transplant. Novel treatments aimed at rational molecular and cellular pathway targets have yielded a number of candidate drugs over recent years; however few new approvals have been granted. With ongoing research, we hope to increasingly offer our MDS patients tailored therapeutic approaches, ultimately decreasing morbidity and mortality.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts or SF3B1 Mutations: The Improved Clinical Utility of World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification 2022 Definitions, a Single-Centre Retrospective Chart Review

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) with ring sideroblasts (RS) are diagnosed via bone marrow aspiration in the presence of either (i) ≥15% RS or (ii) 5–14% RS and an SF3B1 mutation. In the MEDALIST trial and in an interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial, lower-risk MDS-RS patients had decreased transfusion dependency with luspatercept treatment. A total of 6817 patients with suspected hematologic malignancies underwent molecular testing using a next-generation-sequencing-based genetic assay and 395 MDS patients, seen at our centre from 1 January 2018 to 31 May 2023, were reviewed. Of these, we identified 39 evaluable patients as having lower-risk MDS with SF3B1 mutations: there were 20 (51.3%) males and 19 (48.7%) females, with a median age of 77 years (range of 57 to 92). Nineteen (48.7%) patients had an isolated SF3B1 mutation with a mean variant allele frequency of 35.2% +/− 8.1%, ranging from 7.4% to 46.0%. There were 29 (74.4%) patients with ≥15% RS, 6 (15.4%) with 5 to 14% RS, one (2.6%) with 1% RS, and 3 (7.7%) with no RS. Our study suggests that a quarter of patients would be missed based on the morphologic criterion of only using RS greater than 15% and supports the revised 2022 definitions of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC), which shift toward molecularly defined subtypes of MDS and appropriate testing.

World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of non-hematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary or clonal) disorders with the potential for end-organ damage. Hypereosinophilia (HE) has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1.5 × 109/L, and may be associated with tissue damage. After the exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on a combination of various tests. They include morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, molecular testing and flow immunophenotyping to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic hematolymphoid neoplasm. Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2022 World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification endorse a semi-molecular classification scheme of disease subtypes. This includes the major category "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions" (MLN-eo-TK), and the MPN subtype, "chronic eosinophilic leukemia" (CEL). Lymphocyte-variant HE is an aberrant T-cell clone-driven reactive eosinophila, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a diagnosis of exclusion. The goal of therapy is to mitigate eosinophil-mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (e.g., <1.5 × 109/L) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close follow-up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Pemigatinib was recently approved for patients with relapsed or refractory FGFR1-rearranged neoplasms. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for patients with lymphocyte-variant HE and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon-α have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and in steroid-refractory cases of HES. Mepolizumab, an interleukin-5 (IL-5) antagonist monoclonal antibody, is approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration for patients with idiopathic HES. Cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have been used for aggressive forms of HES and CEL, with outcomes reported for limited numbers of patients. Targeted therapies such as the IL-5 receptor antibody benralizumab, IL-5 monoclonal antibody depemokimab, and various tyrosine kinase inhibitors for MLN-eo-TK, are under active investigation.

Comparison of the WHO classification (5th edition) 2022 and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) 2022 for diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia)

In 2022, two classifications were published to define the diagnosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The World Health Organisation (WHO) 5th edition and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) provide an updated summary of current knowledge of the diseases and construct a framework for physicians. Two differing classifications result in discrepancies, which change the definition of AML subtypes and present a challenge in clinical settings. This work summarizes the updated classification systems and discusses their significance in clinical settings while considering the latest findings. Relevant changes affect the i) required blast percentage, ii) AML harbouring CEBPA mutations, iii) AML with KMT2A and MECOM rearrangements, iv) AML with myelodysplasia-related characteristics and in association with this entity AML with mutated RUNX1, and lastly v) AML with TP53 mutation. In summary, a unified classification system would be desirable to achieve harmonized diagnosis and treatment of AML).

Multidisciplinary Approach to the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: Focus on the Pathologist's Key Role.

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIPs) are a heterogeneous group of the broader category of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs), pathologically characterized by the distortion of lung parenchyma by interstitial inflammation and/or fibrosis. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the IIPs was published in 2002 and then updated in 2013, with the authors emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of IIPs. The histological evaluation of IIPs is challenging, and different types of IIPs are classically associated with specific histopathological patterns. However, morphological overlaps can be observed, and the same histopathological features can be seen in totally different clinical settings. Therefore, the pathologist's aim is to recognize the pathologic-morphologic pattern of disease in this clinical setting, and only after multi-disciplinary evaluation, if there is concordance between clinical and radiological findings, a definitive diagnosis of specific IIP can be established, allowing the optimal clinical-therapeutic management of the patient.

Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders: Back to the future.

In the 1980s, immunohistochemistry and clonality analyses became instrumental in the recognition and definition of new types of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CBCL) and the development of new classifications. By accepting loss of pan-T-cell antigens and clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangements as important criteria to differentiate between benign and malignant T-cell proliferations, and monotypic immunoglobulin light-chain expression and clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangements as crucial criteria to distinguish between benign and malignant B-cell proliferations, many cases, until then diagnosed as cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia or pseudolymphoma, were reclassified as primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoma (PCSM-TCL) or primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL), respectively. However, in recent years there is growing awareness that neither these immunohistochemical criteria nor demonstration of T-cell or B-cell clonality is specific for malignant lymphomas. In addition, many studies have reported that these low-grade malignant CTCL and CBCL have an indolent clinical behavior and an excellent prognosis with disease-specific survival rates of or close to 100%. As a result, recent classifications have downgraded several low-grade malignant cutaneous lymphomas to lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD). Both the 5th edition of the WHO classification (2022) and the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) of mature lymphoid neoplasms reclassified PCSM-TCL as primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell LPD and primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma as primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T cell LPD. While the 2022 ICC introduced the term "primary cutaneous marginal zone LPD," in the 5th edition of the WHO classification PCMZL is maintained. In this review we describe the background and rationale of the continually changing terminology of these conditions and discuss the clinical consequences of downgrading malignant lymphomas to LPDs.

Childhood and Adolescent Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas With t(8;14) and BCL2 Expression, Burkitt Lymphoma Versus Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Diagnostic Challenge.

We present 2 diagnostically challenging cases of pediatric/adolescent relapsed/refractory aggressive mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) within the spectrum of Burkitt lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and illustrate the different therapeutic regimens that are employed for pediatric and adult cancer centers. Both cases displayed varying-sized lymphoma cells with occasional single prominent nucleoli and heterogeneous BCL2 expression. Cytogenetics revealed complex karyotypes with t(8:14)(q24.2;q32) and IGH::MYC rearrangement by FISH. Next generation sequencing revealed deleterious TP53 and MYC mutations. We concluded that both could be diagnosed as "DLBCL-NOS with MYC rearrangement" using the current pathologic classifications, 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) and World Health Organization Classifications of Haematolymphoid Tumors (WHO-HAEM5). This report illustrates diagnostic challenges and treatment dilemmas that may be encountered, particularly for adolescent and young adults (AYA).

Prognostic impact of SF3B1 mutation and multilineage dysplasia in myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts: a Mayo Clinic study of 170 informative cases.

The revised 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO4R) classification lists myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) as a separate entity with single lineage (MDS-RS-SLD) or multilineage (MDS-RS-MLD) dysplasia. The more recent International Consensus Classification (ICC) distinguishes between MDS with SF3B1 mutation (MDS-SF3B1) and MDS-RS without SF3B1 mutation; the latter is instead included under the category of MDS not otherwise specified. The current study includes 170 Mayo Clinic patients with WHO4R-defined MDS-RS, including MDS-RS-SLD (N=83) and MDS-RS-MLD (N=87); a subset of 145 patients were also evaluable for the presence of SF3B1 and other mutations, including 126 with (87%) and 19 (13%) without SF3B1 mutation. Median overall survival for all 170 patients was 6.6 years with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 59% and 25%, respectively. A significant difference in overall survival was apparent between MDS-RS-MLD and MDS-RS-SLD (p<0.01) but not between MDS-RS with and without SF3B1 mutation (p=0.36). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent prognostic contribution of MLD (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8; p=0.01) and also identified age (p<0.01), transfusion need at diagnosis (p<0.01), and abnormal karyotype (p<0.01), as additional risk factors; the impact from SF3B1 or other mutations was not significant. Leukemia-free survival was independently affected by abnormal karyotype (p<0.01), RUNX1 (0.02) and IDH1 (p=0.01) mutations, but not by MLD or SF3B1 mutation. Exclusion of patients not meeting ICC-criteria for MDSSF3B1 did not change the observations on overall survival. MLD-based, as opposed to SF3B1 mutationbased, disease classification for MDS-RS might be prognostically more relevant.

The 2022 classifications of B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell disorders

Tumors derived from B-lymphocytes at their various stage of maturation and differentiation (human B-cell lymphomas and leukemias) are the commonest hematological malignancies. Previous editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of Hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms, edited in 2001, 2008, and 2017, intended to standardize the diagnosis of hemopoietic neoplasms overall. Recent advances in lymphoma research, mostly based on genomic as well as molecular analyses, have dramatically expanded our knowledge of lymphoma biology, this leading to improved diagnostic criteria, upgrading of provisional entities, and identification of new tumor types. In 2022, two frameworks for classifying hematolymphoid neoplasms were proposed: the WHO-HAEM5 and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Since a common nosography is essential for advancing health science and providing a foundation for precision medicine, it is critical to recognize possible differences and harmonize the diverse approaches. In this article, the Authors summarizes the key differences between the two most recent classifications by focusing on tumors derived from B-lymphocytes and plasma cells.

Advances towards genome-based acute myeloid leukemia classification: A comparative analysis of WHO-HAEM4R, WHO-HAEM5, and International Consensus Classification.

Two recent guidelines, the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC), were published to refine the diagnostic criteria of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). They both consider genomic features more extensively and expand molecularly defined AML subtypes. In this study, we compared the classifications of 1135 AML cases under both criteria. According to WHO-HAEM5 and ICC, the integration of whole transcriptome sequencing, targeted gene mutation screening, and conventional cytogenetic analysis identified defining genetic abnormalities in 89% and 90% of AML patients, respectively. The classifications displayed discrepancies in 16% of AML cases after being classified using the two guidelines, respectively. Both new criteria significantly reduce the number of cases defined by morphology and differentiation. However, their clinical implementation heavily relies on comprehensive and sophisticated genomic analysis, including genome and transcriptome levels, alongside the assessment of pathogenetic somatic and germline variations. Discrepancies between WHO-HAEM5 and ICC, such as the assignment of RUNX1 mutations, the rationality of designating AML with mutated TP53 as a unique entity, and the scope of rare genetic fusions, along with the priority of concurrent AML-defining genetic abnormalities, are still pending questions requiring further research for more elucidated insights.